Back to SamplesAcademic Discussion — Sample
2.0/ 5
DevelopingPartially Successful
The response articulates a clear opinion against animal testing but lacks specific examples and detailed reasoning to support the claims. Additionally, frequent grammatical errors and limited syntactic variety hinder the overall clarity and effectiveness of the argument.
14 / 30
Basic
Content
3/5Breakdown
Clear purpose3/5
Complete response3/5
Addresses requirements3/5
Working well
- Moral Argument — “experiments prove to be ruthless and inhuman even though they are clained to be ethical.”
To improve
- Lack of Specific Examples Try: Provide specific examples of cases where animal testing has failed to produce reliable results for humans.
- Vague Language Try: Clarify what technologies are available and how they can replace animal testing, providing concrete examples.
Score your own writing
Get the same TOEFL 2026 feedback on your own response — from $29 a month, cancel any time.
Level Up Your Academic Writing
Your path to improvement
Want to excel in academic discussions? Our expert guides cover everything from building strong arguments to engaging effectively with other perspectives.
Academic Discussion Guide
Strategies to excel in the academic discussion task
GuideTips
TOEFL Writing Templates
Effective templates and phrases for TOEFL writing
GuideTemplates
Common Grammar Mistakes
Top grammar errors that hurt your TOEFL score
GuideTips
Every great writer was once a learner. Keep improving!