Trust Center
Why you can check what we say
Reach120 is a practice tool. The most useful thing it can offer is not a claim about how accurate it is — it is the ability to look at how a result was produced and decide for yourself. These pages exist so you can do that.
Independence
Is this ETS, or a test center?
No. Reach120 is an independent practice tool with no ETS affiliation.
How scoring works
How did this result happen?
Which parts are checked against an answer key, which parts an AI model judges, and what neither can tell you.
A complete sample report
What does the feedback actually look like?
One real report, unedited, weaknesses intact — plus what it cannot tell you.
Methodology
Where do the numbers on this site come from?
Every published figure with what it counts, the query behind it and its measurement date — and an explicit "not enough data yet" wherever the sample is too small.
Reviews policy
Where do reviews and testimonials come from?
How reviews are collected, what we will never do to obtain one, and how removal works.
Outcomes
What does the data from this product actually show?
Practice volumes recomputed from the database, and the score-improvement figure we withhold — with the sample size shown either way.
TOEFL myths, checked
Is what prep sites say about the 2026 format true?
Claims that circulate widely, each checked against ETS's own page, with the source link and the date we read it.
Binding policies
Not published yet
These pages are missing on purpose. Each one needs evidence that does not exist yet, and publishing the page before the evidence would itself be a claim. They appear here so the gap is visible rather than quiet.
- Evaluation report — how well the scoring method has been tested
- Learning evidence — whether practice here improves outcomes (the sample this would run on, and how far it is from publishable, is on /outcomes)
- Subprocessors — which vendors receive what data
- Security — verified controls and disclosure process
- Accessibility — audited scope and known limitations