No. There is no order of merit, no score and no best entry, and the structured data emits an unordered list carrying no position. There are no star ratings anywhere — Reach120 has no published review corpus, so a rating would be a number we invented.

Why is Reach120 on every list?

Because omitting ourselves from a list we publish would be the more misleading choice. It is marked on every page, and every Reach120 entry states where the product is weaker as well as what it does.

What if a provider’s page could not be read?

The entry stays on the page and states what the server returned instead of facts. Silently dropping an unreadable provider is indistinguishable from dropping an inconvenient one, and the omission is exactly what a reader cannot check.

Alternatives to the main TOEFL preparation tools

Name: Reach120
Author: Reach120

One page per product, each leading with what that product genuinely does well before listing anything else. Reach120 publishes them and appears on every list, which is stated at the top of each page.

Written by the Reach120 research teamReviewed August 6, 2026

Score a response free, no account

Who publishes these

The alternatives pages

PrepEx alternatives
Leads with what PrepEx does better, then the set: the other five products and Reach120, disclosed.
TestGlider alternatives
Leads with what TestGlider does better, then the set: the other five products and Reach120, disclosed.
Magoosh alternatives
Leads with what Magoosh does better, then the set: the other five products and Reach120, disclosed.
LingoLeap alternatives
Leads with what LingoLeap does better, then the set: the other five products and Reach120, disclosed.
BestMyTest alternatives
Leads with what BestMyTest does better, then the set: the other five products and Reach120, disclosed.
ETS TOEFL TestReady alternatives
Leads with what ETS TOEFL TestReady does better, then the set: the other five products and Reach120, disclosed.

The rules every page in this set follows

Every competitor fact is a sentence their own public page stated, with the URL and the date we read it. Nothing is restated from memory, from an older capture, or from another review site.
Every page states what the other product does better. A test fails the build if that section is empty on any page in the set.
Where a provider’s page would not load for us, the page says so and carries no facts about it. A price we cannot re-verify today is not a price we publish.
There is no ranking, no score, no star rating and no "winner" — not in the copy and not in the structured data.
Reach120’s own prices are not typed on any of these pages. The pricing page is the only place they are stated.

None of these pages argues that you should leave the product you are using. They exist because the searches exist, and because the pages currently answering them were written before the January 2026 format change.

Prefer a direct comparison?

All head-to-head comparisons
The same evidence as two-column tables, with per-task 2026 coverage.

About these alternatives pages

Is this list ranked?: No. There is no order of merit, no score and no best entry, and the structured data emits an unordered list carrying no position. There are no star ratings anywhere — Reach120 has no published review corpus, so a rating would be a number we invented.
Why is Reach120 on every list?: Because omitting ourselves from a list we publish would be the more misleading choice. It is marked on every page, and every Reach120 entry states where the product is weaker as well as what it does.
What if a provider’s page could not be read?: The entry stays on the page and states what the server returned instead of facts. Silently dropping an unreadable provider is indistinguishable from dropping an inconvenient one, and the omission is exactly what a reader cannot check.