Skip to main content
20% off your first payment$5.99 for your first week, then $7.49 · Ends November 15, 2026See plans
Back to SamplesAcademic Discussion — Sample
GoodGenerally Successful

3.5/5 on the ETS 0-5 rater rubric

The response effectively argues for a balanced approach to animal testing, citing relevant examples and modern alternatives. However, it could benefit from deeper engagement with classmates' ideas and more specific examples to enhance its overall impact.

Reach120 practice band estimate — not an official ETS score How we estimate

21 / 30

legacy comparison · pre-2026 scale

Content

4/5

Breakdown

Clear purpose4/5
Complete response4/5
Addresses requirements4/5

Working well

  • Use of relevant examples — “Vaccines and cancer treatments developed through animal research have saved millions of lives, which is hard to dismiss.
  • Incorporation of modern alternatives

To improve

  • Limited specificity in examples Try: Include more specific examples, such as naming particular vaccines or treatments, to enhance the credibility and specificity of the argument.

Score your own writing

Get the same TOEFL 2026 feedback on your own response — from $7.49 every one week, cancel any time.

Score my writing

Level Up Your Academic Writing

Your path to improvement

Want to excel in academic discussions? Our expert guides cover everything from building strong arguments to engaging effectively with other perspectives.

Every great writer was once a learner. Keep improving!

Reach120 is an independent practice tool. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by ETS, and it does not provide official TOEFL® test scores.

TOEFL® is a registered trademark of ETS. This product is not endorsed or approved by ETS.