Back to SamplesAcademic Discussion — Sample
2.0/ 5
DevelopingPartially Successful
The response effectively addresses the topic and engages with a peer's viewpoint, demonstrating a clear stance on NFTs. However, it suffers from grammatical errors and lacks specificity in examples, which detracts from the overall clarity and effectiveness of the argument.
14 / 30
Basic
Content
3.5/5Breakdown
Clear purpose3.5/5
Complete response3.5/5
Addresses requirements3.5/5
Working well
- Acknowledges different perspectives — “While I appreciate Dana’s perspective that NFTs represent a transformative step in the evolution of artistic expression”
- Raises environmental concerns — “relying on blockchain technology, NFTs create the situation to contribute to significant energy consumption to operate”
- Provides a specific example — “For example, some people can enjoy viewing Pak’s “The Merge,” which sold for 91.8 million dollars”
To improve
- Lacks clarity in expression Try: contribute significantly to energy consumption
- Conclusion lacks a strong closing statement Try: In conclusion, while NFTs offer a new avenue for digital art, their environmental impact and questionable engagement with art challenge their legitimacy as an evolution of artistic expression.
Score your own writing
Get the same TOEFL 2026 feedback on your own response — from $29 a month, cancel any time.
Level Up Your Academic Writing
Your path to improvement
Want to excel in academic discussions? Our expert guides cover everything from building strong arguments to engaging effectively with other perspectives.
Academic Discussion Guide
Strategies to excel in the academic discussion task
GuideTips
TOEFL Writing Templates
Effective templates and phrases for TOEFL writing
GuideTemplates
Common Grammar Mistakes
Top grammar errors that hurt your TOEFL score
GuideTips
Every great writer was once a learner. Keep improving!