3.5/5 on the ETS 0-5 rater rubric
The response is clear and engages with a classmate's perspective, which is commendable. However, it could benefit from more specific examples and deeper elaboration to fully support the argument. Minor grammatical errors are present but do not hinder comprehension.
Reach120 practice band estimate — not an official ETS score How we estimate
21 / 30
legacy comparison · pre-2026 scale
Content
3.5/5Breakdown
Working well
- Logical Argument — “By utilizing AI, employees can enhance workplace productivity and reduce overwhelming stress.”
To improve
- Lack of Specific Examples Try: Provide specific examples of AI tools or applications that improve productivity, such as AI-powered scheduling tools or data analysis software.
- Generic Conclusion Try: Strengthen the conclusion by summarizing key points and reiterating the main argument, such as highlighting specific societal benefits of AI.
Score your own writing
Get the same TOEFL 2026 feedback on your own response — from $7.49 every one week, cancel any time.
Level Up Your Academic Writing
Your path to improvement
Want to excel in academic discussions? Our expert guides cover everything from building strong arguments to engaging effectively with other perspectives.
Academic Discussion Guide
Strategies to excel in the academic discussion task
TOEFL Writing Templates
Effective templates and phrases for TOEFL writing
Common Grammar Mistakes
Top grammar errors that hurt your TOEFL score