Skip to main content
20% off your first payment$5.99 for your first week, then $7.49 · Ends November 15, 2026See plans
Back to SamplesAcademic Discussion — Sample
GoodPartially Successful

3.5/5 on the ETS 0-5 rater rubric

The response presents a clear argument with examples, but they are somewhat generic. There is some syntactic variety, but the response could benefit from more specific examples and deeper engagement with classmates' ideas.

Reach120 practice band estimate — not an official ETS score How we estimate

21 / 30

legacy comparison · pre-2026 scale

Content

3.5/5

Breakdown

Clear purpose3.5/5
Complete response3.5/5
Addresses requirements3.5/5

Working well

  • Use of examples — “For example, researchers can develop new cancer treatments despite certain ethical risks, which can help save millions of lives.
  • Logical conclusion — “Taking everything into consideration, I believe that medical research should prioritize potential breakthroughs because it can help control diseases and save millions of lives.

To improve

  • Lack of depth in examples Try: Provide more detailed examples or statistics to support the claim, such as specific diseases or breakthroughs that have benefited future generations.
  • Missing spaces Try: Ensure there is a space after the period: 'generations. For example,'

Score your own writing

Get the same TOEFL 2026 feedback on your own response — from $7.49 every one week, cancel any time.

Score my writing

Level Up Your Academic Writing

Your path to improvement

Want to excel in academic discussions? Our expert guides cover everything from building strong arguments to engaging effectively with other perspectives.

Every great writer was once a learner. Keep improving!

Reach120 is an independent practice tool. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by ETS, and it does not provide official TOEFL® test scores.

TOEFL® is a registered trademark of ETS. This product is not endorsed or approved by ETS.