Skip to main content
20% off your first payment$5.99 for your first week, then $7.49 · Ends November 15, 2026See plans
Back to SamplesAcademic Discussion — Sample
GoodPartially Successful

3.5/5 on the ETS 0-5 rater rubric

The response effectively states a position and provides some elaboration. However, the examples are somewhat generic, and more specific details would enhance the argument. The language is mostly accurate, with some syntactic variety, but could benefit from more complex structures.

Reach120 practice band estimate — not an official ETS score How we estimate

21 / 30

legacy comparison · pre-2026 scale

Content

3.5/5

Breakdown

Clear purpose3.5/5
Complete response3.5/5
Addresses requirements3.5/5

Working well

  • Support with examples — “learners can use online apps like Note30 AI to promote long-term retention.
  • Logical conclusion — “Taking everything into consideration, online learning aids students in studying at their own pace and improving their knowledge more effectively.

To improve

  • Generic examples Try: Provide a specific example of how Note30 AI aids in retention, such as a feature that helps with memory recall.
  • Limited elaboration Try: Elaborate on how studying at one's own pace specifically contributes to the development of critical thinking skills, perhaps by allowing for deeper engagement with the material.

Score your own writing

Get the same TOEFL 2026 feedback on your own response — from $7.49 every one week, cancel any time.

Score my writing

Level Up Your Academic Writing

Your path to improvement

Want to excel in academic discussions? Our expert guides cover everything from building strong arguments to engaging effectively with other perspectives.

Every great writer was once a learner. Keep improving!

Reach120 is an independent practice tool. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by ETS, and it does not provide official TOEFL® test scores.

TOEFL® is a registered trademark of ETS. This product is not endorsed or approved by ETS.