3.5/5 on the ETS 0-5 rater rubric
The response is clear and mostly relevant, with some variety in syntax. It lacks specific examples and deeper engagement with classmates, which limits its score. Improving the specificity of examples and elaborating further could enhance the response.
Reach120 practice band estimate — not an official ETS score How we estimate
21 / 30
legacy comparison · pre-2026 scale
Content
3.5/5Breakdown
Working well
- Acknowledgment of opposing views — “Although some people might argue that it has several drawbacks, I am convinced that this approach has numerous advantages.”
- Use of specific examples — “For instance, learners can use online apps like Note30 AI to promote long-term retention.”
To improve
- Lack of detailed examples Try: Provide more detailed examples by explaining how Note30 AI functions and its specific impact on learning outcomes.
Score your own writing
Get the same TOEFL 2026 feedback on your own response — from $7.49 every one week, cancel any time.
Level Up Your Academic Writing
Your path to improvement
Want to excel in academic discussions? Our expert guides cover everything from building strong arguments to engaging effectively with other perspectives.
Academic Discussion Guide
Strategies to excel in the academic discussion task
TOEFL Writing Templates
Effective templates and phrases for TOEFL writing
Common Grammar Mistakes
Top grammar errors that hurt your TOEFL score