Is animal testing justified for medical research that could save human lives? Explain your view.

I believe that animal testing is justified for medical research that could save human lives, as it is a more practical and effective approach in many situations. While I appreciate the points made by both students, I agree with Student 1. This is because animal testing saves not only humans but also creatures. For example, many medical breakthroughs, such as insulin and antibiotics, have been developed through research on organisms, benefiting both people and animals. This clearly shows that animal testing has historically led to significant advancements in medicine. In addition, the potential to save millions of individuals outweighs the ethical costs, which makes this idea even more beneficial. While Student 2 argues that animal testing is increasingly unjustifiable given modern alternatives, I believe that this point is less convincing because these alternatives cannot yet fully replicate the complex biological systems of living organisms. Therefore, my opinion remains that animal testing is necessary for medical progress. Overall, I strongly support this view. For these reasons, I firmly believe that animal testing is justified in the context of medical research that could save human lives.

strongly agree with Student 1. One important reason is that animal testing helps scientists determine whether new medicines are safe before they are used on humans. This reduces potential risks and protects public health. Furthermore, many medical breakthroughs, including vaccines and treatments for serious diseases, were developed through animal research. As a result, people today live longer and healthier lives. Therefore, although ethical concerns should be considered, animal testing continues to play a vital role in medical advancement.