Skip to main content
20% off your first payment$5.99 for your first week, then $7.49 · Ends November 15, 2026See plans
Listening samples

Listening · Approved worked audio

Adding Sound to Early Films

Listen to the authored recording, then inspect the keyed answers at their source moments.

Source
lecture
Difficulty
medium
Domain
film studies
Published

Authored sample · 1:22 · link expires in 120 minutes

Timestamped review

Hear the evidence, then check the reasoning

5 questions
  1. Question 1

    Speaker functionCue 0:00

    Why does the professor mention a fist hitting a slab of meat?

    • AA. To describe how real punches are recorded on set
    • BB. To argue that sound design is unnecessary
    • CC. To explain why early cameras were noisy
    • D. To show that movie sound effects are deliberately constructed illusions

    Why D is correct

    The example illustrates that effects 'didn't have to be realistic' but convincing, since real recordings sound thin.

    Why the other choices miss

    A
    It's a fabricated effect, not a recording of a real punch.
    B
    He argues sound design is essential, not unnecessary.
    C
    Camera noise is a separate earlier point.
  2. Question 2

    InferenceCue 0:00

    What can be inferred about the soundtracks audiences perceive as natural?

    • AA. They are usually raw recordings of real events
    • B. They are carefully built illusions designed to feel real
    • CC. They are added only to comedy films
    • DD. They are less effective than live piano music

    Why B is correct

    He concludes the soundtrack 'you experience as natural is, in fact, carefully constructed — an illusion designed to feel real.'

    Why the other choices miss

    A
    Real recordings often sound thin, so effects are built instead.
    C
    Sound design applies broadly, not just to comedy.
    D
    No claim ranks constructed sound below live piano.
  3. Question 3

    Main idea and purposeCue 0:00

    What is the lecture mainly about?

    • AA. Why cameras stopped being used in cinema
    • B. How sound in film developed and how sound effects are constructed
    • CC. Why silent films were more popular than sound films
    • DD. How to become a theater pianist

    Why B is correct

    The professor traces live music, the arrival of recorded sound, and the deliberate craft of sound effects.

    Why the other choices miss

    A
    Cameras kept being used; they were just temporarily restricted.
    C
    No popularity comparison is made.
    D
    The pianist is an example, not a how-to topic.
  4. Question 4

    Key detailsCue 0:00

    Why did films briefly become more static after recorded sound arrived?

    • AA. Musicians refused to play faster music
    • BB. Audiences preferred still images
    • C. Noisy cameras had to be sealed in soundproof booths
    • DD. The screens grew too large to film around

    Why C is correct

    He explains noisy sound cameras were 'sealed inside soundproof booths,' making them almost impossible to move.

    Why the other choices miss

    A
    Recorded sound replaced the live musician; their preferences aren't the cause.
    B
    Audience preference is not given as the cause.
    D
    Screen size is not mentioned as a factor.
  5. Question 5

    Key detailsCue 0:00

    What role did a live pianist play in silent-film theaters?

    • AA. Recording dialogue for later playback
    • B. Playing music that told the audience how to feel
    • CC. Selling tickets at the front of the theater
    • DD. Operating the projector during screenings

    Why B is correct

    He says the musician played along and 'the music told the audience how to feel.'

    Why the other choices miss

    A
    Silent films had no recorded dialogue for the pianist to record.
    C
    Selling tickets is not mentioned.
    D
    Operating the projector is not the pianist's role.

Practice Listening

Apply what you noticed in a real TOEFL Listening practice set.

Practice Listening

Reach120 is an independent practice tool. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by ETS, and it does not provide official TOEFL® test scores.

TOEFL® is a registered trademark of ETS. This product is not endorsed or approved by ETS.